| Introduction
I think that most retained personnel are now aware that there is a massive
amount of change going on in the UK fire and rescue service. This newsletter
is packed with information about many of these changes, and we urge you
to read this, and any other information that comes your way.
We have been very critical of the failure of many fire service bodies
to keep personnel in the picture in the past 18 months. The fire and rescue
service has been driven by the dispute between the National Employers
and the FBU, and the casualty of this is that many other issues have not
been dealt with, and a significant number of personnel have not felt they
are part of the process of change.
There is light on the horizon though, with the promise of new and more
inclusive institutions to drive through the process of modernising the
service for the benefit of our communities.
In the meantime, all of us must work at local and national level to ensure
our views are heard.
The fire and rescue service is going to change-and rapidly-lets make sure
it is for the better!
Derek Chadbon - National General Secretary
Lack
of Communication causes unrest in the Fire Service
The November Pay Deal continues
to cause much confusion with neither the NJC nor local brigade pay departments
being able to answer the many queries Retained personnel are raising.
It seems strange that the current NJC has implemented a pay deal supposedly
worth an average of 13.74% but many of the details are missing. We have
been inundated with queries ourselves over the new pay structure because
of no information having been fed from the National Employers to the brigades
and their respective employees.
Independent analysis
of the pay deal shows the new structure produces changes in pay from minus
10.4% to plus 17.3%!!
Initially the new deal
was even worse for Retained but due to an outcry by personnel and the
RFU, the current NJC postponed until 1 July 2004 two major changes to
pay in the hope of softening the blow, namely;
- the new "Disturbance"
payment will continue to be paid for "Re-directions", but
only until 30 June 2004, after which only the initial call will attract
a "Disturbance" payment and any additional calls received
before booking off will be paid at the hourly rate only
- the "Disturbance
Fee" will no longer be paid when a call is received on a drill
period after 30 June and payment of the hourly rate will continue from
the beginning of the drill period until either the end of the call or
the end of the drill period, whichever is longer.
The
"Guaranteed" 7% Increase and Safeguarding
The NJC has said that retained personnel will "receive a minimum
increase of 7% for the same pattern and level of work activity".
So far, there has been
no national guidance on how this protection will actually work, and therefore
few brigades have issued any information (some two months after the pay
deal). It seems contradictory when brigades are seeking additional staff
to cope with the implications of the new pay structure at a time when
brigades are supposed to be making savings!
We do not envy the problems
that brigade payroll departments face in the coming months but we do however
ask Retained personnel to be vigilant by ensuring that they are not underpaid
due to the complexities of the new system.
Devon
Implement Protection Arrangements
After discussions between the RFU and Devon, the brigade has implemented
its own internal safeguarding arrangements, which will check each individuals
pay, and will make an adjustment if they are worse off under the new arrangements.
We suggest other brigades follow suit for the benefit of Retained personnel
and their payroll departments.
Safeguarding
Calculator
The RFU has put in place on its website a pay calculator that enables
members to calculate any reduction in pay on a monthly basis, and there
is a suggested memo to accompany this as a claim to your pay department.
Paper copies of this
system can be obtained by telephoning RFU HQ if you do not have access
to our website.
Meeting
with National Employers
The RFU had a meeting with the national employers on 10 December 2003,
and although we were not involved in the pay negotiations, they have asked
us to submit our views, and this includes the need to implement a national
pay protection arrangement for all retained personnel in every brigade.
The Staged Payment-when
do we get the other 3.5%? The fact that only 3.5% of the 7% increase due
from 7/11/03 has been agreed has not helped overcome the considerable
confusion. The second half of the increase will not be sanctioned until
the Audit Commission has reported on whether all of the pay deal conditions
are being met (see Employers Circular 25/03 containing the Joint Secretaries
Position Statement).
In the meantime, retained
personnel are supposed to be being paid 3.5% extra from 7/11/03 and parity
of the hourly rate. However, partly due to the usual time lag in retained
payments, and partly due to all of the confusion surrounding the pay deal,
some brigades are having great difficulty in implementing these new payments.
Worse still, very few Retained personnel can understand what they are
actually being paid when they receive their pay advice slips. We believe
brigades have an obligation to ensure personnel have much better information
on what they are actually being paid, an itemised payslip as issued in
Devon for example.
Unresolved Pay Query.
At the time of writing we have asked, but received no answers to the question
put to the National Employers, will the "Disturbance" fee be
doubled on public holidays?
Premium
Overtime Pay
Wholetime personnel receive premium overtime rates after working 42 hours
in a week. Does this now apply to Retained under parity say, for example,
when you have completed 42 hours on a training course, and then undertake
additional hours in fire calls or training? Yet another query the employers
have so far failed to clarify.
Payment
of the Hourly Rate
We have been told the new (wholetime) hourly rate will be paid after working
75 minutes, and will be subject to the payment of one full hour minimum,
but the employers propose to change this to payment only for completed
15-minute periods. This will have catastrophic implications on Retained
personnel and reduce earning considerably bringing into question the theoretical
average pay rise of 13.74%. Does anyone on the current NJC understand
the workings of the Retained system? On the evidence presented to us and
serving personnel it seems not.
It remains to be seen
if the employers pursue this with the FBU under the existing NJC arrangements,
or wait until the new NJC arrangements are up and running, with RFU membership.
In the meantime the
RFU are consulting our lawyers about the right of the Employers to pay
personnel the parity of hourly rate- but not until 75 minutes has been
worked.
Pay
Review Team
The RFU is currently putting into place a Retained Pay Review Team which
will produce various options for a new Retained Pay System which unlike
the current deal will aim to;
- overcome the shortage
of day cover on many stations
- deal with the 20% overall shortfall in retained numbers
- provide parity of pensions and other conditions of service
Availability
The new availability system of 120 hours per week for a full retaining
fee is being ignored by many brigades, who are continuing with their
previous measures of recording availability and response to calls. This
makes a mockery of the whole process, how can one brigade pay an employee
¾ Retaining fee for providing 120 hours of fire cover compared
to a neighbouring station who would pay their employee the full retainer?
RFU Pay Poll
We issued a one page questionnaire on the new pay structure back in
November and although replies are still being received at HQ, we can
inform you that at the time of writing the result is a staggering 98.2%
are unhappy with the new pay structure. We will be forwarding our results
to the Employers shortly.
The Future?
We expect the role and workload of Retained personnel to be affected
by a number of changes that are on the horizon, including:
- Call management (reductions in AFA's) which is already in operation
in Oxfordshire
- Integrated Risk Management Plans
- Integrated Personal Development System (extra training hours)
- A greater emphasis on Community Safety
- Opportunities for Retained to take on additional and wider roles,
including co-responder schemes, promotion to management roles, instructing,
etc.
The RFU has told
the National Employers that we believe the November 2003 pay deal will
have to be re-negotiated, as it does nothing to focus on the current
and future needs of communities covered by Retained personnel.
Parity Inequalities
The November 2003 pay deal is the second stage of the pay arrangements
that were backdated to November 2002, following the FBU's strike action.
Part of this deal provided for two parity exercises:
- Parity for Control personnel was backdated to Stage 1 from November
2002
- Although part of the same deal, the Retained hourly rate parity was
not backdated, and was implemented a year later from November 2003,
we cannot understand why the NJC agreed to this.
This is not parity of
treatment and therefore the RFU is consulting our legal advisers.
The
Future (part 2)?
The National Employers have told us not to expect the failures in the
recent retained pay deal to be put right under the old NJC. ACAS are currently
involved in setting up the new NJC that was announced in the White Paper,
which they say will be completed by 31st January 2004.
If they fail to get
agreement on the new NJC, then the Government has said they will impose
the change, with full RFU recognition. The RFU does not pretend that we
will be able to overcome all of the problems of Retained pay and conditions
immediately, but we will make sure that your views are at last heard,
and your interests are looked after. Where legal action is shown to be
the only option, then we will pursue it.
At the same time, the
RFU has been pushing for action on many other issues, which are not within
the remit of the NJC, such as recruitment and retention.
RFU
Recognition
While we understand the delay in forming the new NJC is frustrating for
our members we have been working with a number of pro-active brigades
who want to recognise the RFU now and have therefore put forward and had
agreed by their fire authorities to grant the RFU full recognition. These
brigades currently are; Buckinghamshire, Mid & West Wales, North Yorkshire,
Lincolnshire, with other brigades in the process being, Lancashire, Warwickshire,
Leicestershire, Somerset and Hereford & Worcester. The rest of the
brigades are waiting for the RFU to take up our seat on the new NJC before
progressing agreements. The above are in addition to our recognition agreement
in over 25 brigades.
Retained
Review Team
At a conference organised by the RFU and Anglia Polytechnic University
on 15/12/03, Phil Hope, Minister at the ODPM announced the setting up
of a stakeholder review team, including the RFU, to undertake a wide-ranging
review of these Retained issues. The first meeting will be held this month,
and the Team will report during the summer.
Retirement
at 55
At the RFU conference, the Minister also announced a review of medical
guidelines and the need for a compulsory retirement age as part of modernisation
of pensions. This follows extensive RFU lobbying that has shown that arbitrary
retirement on the stroke of midnight on the 55th birthday is nonsense,
if it does not take account of fitness, need and willingness to serve.
In the meantime, ODPM guidance has recently been issued to every fire
authority reminding them of the existing (limited) flexibility to extend
service beyond 55, until the above reviews have been carried out.
Retained
Questionnaire
The RFU conference at Chelmsford on 15 December was attended by representatives
from the majority of brigades who came to hear the outcome of a survey
of the opinions of Retained personnel who were sent a questionnaire earlier
in the year. This was initiated by the RFU to gauge the opinion (for the
first time) of personnel at the "sharp end" who have been under-represented
in the past.
The questionnaire was
devised by Anglia Polytechnic University, and analysed by them in order
to protect the impartiality of the exercise. The outcome will help to
inform some of the work to be undertaken by the Retained Review Team.
We are not yet ready to publish all of the details of this valuable research,
but here are a few "snippets";
- The majority of
Retained personnel joined and continued in order to serve their communities.
- Only 19% joined in response to advertising, and the recruitment process
takes to long.
- The Service is heavily reliant on the self-employed.
- Over 84% of personnel are willing to undertake more training under
IPDS.
- There was a high level of dissatisfaction and a feeling of being discriminated
against due to the failure to provide a pension scheme.
Further information on the outcome of this survey will be issued in
due course.
Change
Management
We do not necessarily support all of the theories of management in the
textbooks, but we do agree with every single one that picks out the essential
importance of the need to manage change and especially the need to communicate
with personnel
We do not think the
current NJC have been successful in managing this process of change in
relation to Retained pay.
Integrated
Personal Development System (IPDS)
This change from rank to role continues to give cause for concern. Many
Retained personnel have not yet been advised by their brigade how this
affects them; others have received conflicting information-for example
most brigades have indicated that Retained Officers in Charge are Watch
Managers B, but others have made them Watch Managers A.
Again, many of the problems
have been due to IPDS having been designed for wholetime, with Retained
grafted on the end. The RFU has raised its concerns over IPDS implementation
with the National Employers.
While we are on the
subject of the lack of change management and "grafting" retained
on the back of something designed for wholetime, there is much dismay
about the implementation of IPDS. This is particularly the case where
Retained Officers in Charge have been downgrade to Watch Manager, when
their true role is that of a station manager. Another case, we are afraid
of those negotiating the recent deal, not understanding the Retained.
This raises another
issue, because the recent pay agreement provides for brigades to pay a
three-quarter retaining fee to personnel undertaking less than 120 hours
cover a week. Yet, many brigades in the past have paid Retained OIC's
a full retainer, on the grounds that, regardless of operational hours
of cover given, they are always on call, 168 hours a week, and are regularly
contacted by their station personnel, brigade managers and the public,
for their station manager duties.
We would be interested
to know if any Retained OIC's previously on a full retainer have been
reduced to a three-quarter level, because of the recent pay agreement.
Where
Do We Go From Here?
The RFU feels the long-term prospects for Retained personnel in a modernised
fire and rescue service are still good, but we have many reservations
about the lack of consultation in the short-term. We have little faith
in the current NJC to understand and resolve these issues.
We do feel the Government
is aware of the problems and the potential for developing the future of
the Retained Service, but unfortunately, they tell us that they cannot
get involved in matters of pay and conditions of service.
In order to progress
the interests of all retained personnel, and in view of the failures of
the current NJC arrangements, we are pursuing a number of legal options
with our advisers. We will keep you informed
RFU
Subscriptions
The RFU subscriptions rates are due for review on 1st January, and these
normally increase by the value of the pay increase from the previous November.
This year it has been
particularly difficult to establish what the pay increase has been, as
this has varied between individuals. Due to the RFU's newly acquired recognition
nationally the demands on our organisation will be increased ten-fold
requiring additional members to provide RFU representation on all relevant
bodies. Legal fees are also increasing, as a result of some of the issues
covered in this newsletter. Accordingly, we are increasing our membership
fees from £7 to £7.50 per month. This will be reviewed by
our annual conference in May.
If you have a particular
important issue which you would like to put forward to be taken up at
national level either contact the RFU HQ or your local committee member.
|